E. Nava
To Win
J. Schwaerzler
To Win
Johannes Haerteis vs Emilio Nava Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W L L W L L
Form
W W W W W W W W W LHead To Head: Haerteis 1 - 1 Nava
They have played 5 sets in total, with Haerteis winning 2 and Nava winning 3. The last match between Haerteis and Nava was at the Porto Challenger, 01-08-2023, First, Hard with Emilio Nava getting the victory 7-6(3) 7-6(2).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Johannes Haerteis | 1 |
| Emilio Nava | 1 |
Porto Challenger(01-08-2023)
7
6
7
6
| Haerteis | Stats | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 76% (31-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 899 | Ranking | 132 |
| 300 | Highest Rank | 124 |
| 29 | Age | 23 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 6 |
| 51% (226-218) | Career Total W/L | 60% (219-147) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $442,385 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Stearns VS Birrell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Emilio Nava
Player
Johannes Haerteis
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 1-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Johannes Haerteis
Player
Emilio Nava
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 25 | Games Won | 26 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 1:59:32 | Average Match Time | 1:59:32 |
| 65% (111/170) | 1st Serve % | 61% (103/168) |
| 59% (66/111) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (70/103) |
| 53% (31/59) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (26/65) |
| 50% (9/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (8/16) |
| 43% (72/168) | Return Points Win % | 43% (73/170) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Johannes Haerteis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mikail Alimli
Player
Johannes Haerteis
63%
(
5 of
8)
1st Serve %
58%
(
7 of
12)
1
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Johannes Haerteis
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannes Haerteis
Player
Jody Maginley
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Johannes Haerteis
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
14
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Johannes Haerteis
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannes Haerteis
Player
Luca Hesselmann
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Johannes Haerteis
72%
(
78 of
108)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
43 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Johannes Haerteis
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Johannes Haerteis
Player
Kai Lemstra
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannes Haerteis
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(2) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Emilio Nava
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
96)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Murphy Cassone
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Liam Draxl
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Eliot Spizzirri
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Tomas Barrios Vera
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
6
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Chris Rodesch
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51% (226/218) | Win/Loss | 60% (219/147) |
| 51% (515/504) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (486/375) |
| 51% (4888/4789) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4358/4048) |
| 49% (33/35) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (89/73) |
| 45% (79/97) | Clay Win/Loss | 68% (100/46) |
| 57% (114/85) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (28/23) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.52 |
| 1302 | Aces Total | 2137 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1422 | Total Double Faults | 1037 |
| 1:16:42 | Average Match Time | 1:36:41 |
| 535.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 370.66 |
| 63% (15508/24777) | 1st Serve % | 63% (15798/25259) |
| 69% (10706/15508) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (11201/15798) |
| 47% (4365/9269) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4871/9461) |
| 42% (984/2325) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (941/2248) |
| 39% (9478/24372) | Return Points Win % | 38% (9584/25310) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 55% (12/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 40% (8/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/4) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (9/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (74/82) | Challenger W/L | 62% (142/87) |
| 54% (152/132) | Futures W/L | 65% (48/26) |
| 51% (223/434) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (214/357) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 55% (77/141) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (76/157) |
| 53% (75/141) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (74/121) |
| 83% (233/194) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (204/176) |
| 16% (233/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (204/28) |
| 15% (211/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (162/42) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
